|
|
|
0 registered members (),
95
guests, and 7
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums37
Topics138,168
Posts1,080,940
Members15,144
| |
Most Online907
Dec 28th, 2019
|
|
 Positive Camber ? Why ?
#1105807
11/11/20 04:29 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 59
OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
|
Positive camber creates stability, i get that. But i hate the look of it and wont it wear the outside of the tires ? And after a turn and i let up on the steering wheel it returns to center, factory knows best, but i still dont care for it.
Any harm in changing it ?
91 (Gen1) Monty, 3.0L V6, Auto 4 Door.
Disabled Driver.
|
|
|
Re: Positive Camber ? Why ?
[Re: Trailmonkey]
#1105808
11/11/20 09:50 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,340
Trail Leader
|
The last front end alignment I had on my 87 Raider, the tech set the caster to 1 degree. The area that I lived in, then, had badly crowned roads and it made no sense to have too much positive adjustment. I put 60K miles on afterward with no appreciable to tire difference. I don't think your eye would pick up on the caster difference as easily as camber. My $0.02.
|
|
|
Re: Positive Camber ? Why ?
[Re: Trailmonkey]
#1105809
11/13/20 05:57 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 59
OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
|
Was reading that alot of people just go with 0* camber.
Ive not had the chance to see what shims it has. When i do the brake rotors and wheel bearings ill see.
So long as the bolts ar long enough ill try and get it at 0*...
Also set toe at 0 instead of what ever it is now, definitely toe in what ever it is..
91 (Gen1) Monty, 3.0L V6, Auto 4 Door.
Disabled Driver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
